Dec 3, 2025
The Classic RVOT PVC
RVOT vs LVOT PVC: How to Differentiate
ECG Red Flags in PVC Morphology
Critical PVC Burden Thresholds
PVC-Induced Cardiomyopathy vs Primary Cardiomyopathy: How to Differentiate
NSVT in a Structurally Normal Heart
NSVT in Ischemic Heart Disease: MUSTT and MADIT Criteria
NSVT in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)
NSVT in Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Step 1: Initial Workup for All Patients
Step 2: When to Order Cardiac MRI
Step 3: PVC Treatment Options - Pharmacological Therapy
PVC Ablation Success Rates by Location

A 52-year-old man with hypertension enters the clinic complaining of palpitations. His Holter report, which shows a 28% load of monomorphic PVCs with inferior axis LBBB morphology, ends up on your desk. On the other hand, the echocardiography shows an LVEF of 38%. This is the crucial time. "Is this a case of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy, or is the cardiomyopathy the primary problem, with the PVCs just a bystander?" is the crucial question your consultant asks.
Whether you plan an ablation, offer reassurance, or think about an ICD, your response determines everything. For high-stakes tests like NEET SS, let's construct the structure you need to respond with complete confidence.
.jpg)
Let's be exact first. An impulse that originates inside the ventricles and deviates from the regular conduction system is known as a Premature Ventricular Complex (PVC). The hallmark ECG feature includes a large QRS complex (generally greater than 120 ms), no preceding P wave, and typically a fully compensating pause.
A step up is non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). It is described as a sequence of three or more consecutive ventricular beats at a pace higher than 100 beats per minute that ends on its own in less than 30 seconds without resulting in hemodynamic collapse.
Exam Tip: Avoid becoming confused by the terminology. NSVT does not apply to a run of precisely three beats at 95 bpm. On the other hand, whether or not a 35-second run ends on its own, it is still regarded as sustained VT.
Therapy is guided by an understanding of the mechanism. Triggered Activity is the cause of the majority of benign, idiopathic PVCs that we observe from the outflow tracts. Consider delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs), which are essentially caused by improper calcium processing within the cell, resulting in an additional, premature beat. Because they target this calcium-driven mechanism, beta-blockers and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are effective.
Re-entry is the key participant in the context of structural heart disease. An impulse can loop around and re-excite the ventricle due to a circuit of slow conduction created by areas of scar from a previous MI.
Then there is Automaticity, in which an ectopic focus just chooses to fire. Digoxin poisoning typically follows this pattern.
For NEET SS, this is a fundamental ability. Let's dissect the most prevalent pattern.
The Right Ventricular Outflow Tract is the source of 70 to 80% of benign PVCs. Imagine where it is located in the chest: anterior and superior. An extremely predictable ECG signature results from depolarization spreading down toward the inferior wall and away from the right ventricle:
The appearance of PVCs from the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LBBB/inferior axis) can be quite similar. The obvious distinction? The precordial shift. The vector of depolarization sweeps toward the anterior leads significantly sooner due to the LVOT's more posterior location. Thus, an early precordial transition (V2–V3) favors LVOT origin, whereas a late transition (V4 or later) favours RVOT origin.
Not every PVC is made equally. Watch out for these patterns:
What burden is harmful is the crucial question.
PVC Burden Risk Level Clinical Action <10% Low risk Associated cardiomyopathy is uncommon 10-24% Gray zone Patients require monitoring as risk gradually rises ≥24% High risk Can detect PVC-induced cardiomyopathy with ~80% sensitivity and specificity
We become concerned when the daily PVC count exceeds 10,000–20,000.
Also Read: Rapid ECG Review: High-Yield Cardiology Tracings for NEET PG Medicine
Now let's return to our clinical situation. How can you determine whether the cardiomyopathy was brought on by the PVCs or the other way around?
Features Favoring PVC-Induced Cardiomyopathy:
Features Favoring Primary Cardiomyopathy:
NSVT is not a diagnosis; it is a finding. The underlying heart substrate completely determines its significance.
The prognosis for a structurally normal heart is usually good, and there is no discernible increase in the risk of sudden death. Exercise-induced NSVT is an exception, as it may indicate increased long-term risk.
Our Practice in Ischemic Heart Disease Is Shaped by Historic Trials:
MUSTT & MADIT: These groundbreaking studies have shown that if a patient has a history of MI, low LVEF (<=35% MADIT & <40% MUSTT), and NSVT, an electrophysiological study to test for inducible sustained VT can identify patients who will greatly benefit from an ICD.
MADIT II: Subsequently showed that even in the absence of NSVT or inducibility data, an ICD saves lives in post-MI patients with LVEF <= 30%.
Important Timing Warning: NSVT occurring in the first 48 hours after MI is common and does not predict long-term mortality; NSVT that persists or appears after 48 hours is prognostically significant.
NSVT is a major warning sign for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). About 20% of HCM patients have it, and it is a powerful indicator of the risk of premature death, especially in younger patients (under 30). The NSVT's features are important; longer runs, quicker rates (>200 bpm), and recurrent episodes increase the risk.
In non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, the picture is less clear. The DANISH trial showed that preventative ICDs reduced sudden mortality but did not improve overall survival despite the high frequency of NSVT. The recommendation in the guideline was consequently reduced. However, the presence of specific gene mutations (e.g., LMNA, PLN) or high-risk features (e.g., LGE on CMR) increases the significance of NSVT.
Everybody's workup consists of:
When the LVEF is low, the PVCs are polymorphic, have a non-outflow tract shape, or you suspect an underlying illness such as sarcoidosis or ARVC, consider CMR. When it comes to risk categorization, the existence or lack of LGE is crucial.
Beta-blockers: Our first choice medications. They are safe and only slightly reduce PVC (10 to 15%).
Calcium Channel Blockers (Non-DHP): These work just as well as diltiazem or verapamil, especially for outflow tract PVCs.
Propafenone or Flecainide: Excellent for suppression, but keep in mind the CAST trial's legacy: because of the pro-arrhythmic risk, no patient with structural cardiac illness should use them.
Amiodarone and Sotalol: Stronger antiarrhythmics. Amiodarone is the most effective, but its long-term toxicity is a disadvantage.
When frequent, monomorphic PVCs are thought to be the cause of cardiomyopathy ESC 2022 gives a Class I recommendation for catheter ablation when frequent monomorphic PVCs are the likely cause of LV dysfunction (PVC-induced cardiomyopathy)
PVC Origin Success Rate RVOT PVCs 80-94% (best candidates) LVOT/Aortic Cusp 70-85% Papillary Muscle/Epicardial 50-70% (more difficult)
Patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy have the most satisfying results. Over 80% of patients should see a significant improvement in LVEF when ablation lowers the burden to less than 5%, usually in 4 to 6 months.
Final Clinical Pearl: Determining the substrate is the first thing that comes to mind when you observe NSVT on a Holter. It's frequently a source of comfort for a young individual with a healthy heart. It's an important component of a bigger, riskier puzzle in an elderly patient with a history of infarction and low EF. The underlying heart explains the significance of the arrhythmia.
A PVC can be compared to a single additional heartbeat that fires from the incorrect location because the ventricles jump the gun before the regular electrical signal reaches them. When you combine three or more of them in quick succession (we're talking about more than 100 beats per minute), you have NSVT, which ends on its own in thirty seconds. In actuality, NSVT is really a brief burst of rapidly firing PVCs.
We examine your PVC burden, which is essentially the proportion of PVCs in your total heartbeats throughout a 24-hour period. Less than 10%? Usually, there is nothing to be concerned about. There is a bit of a grey area between 10 and 24% that should be monitored. There is serious concern that your heart muscle may weaken over time after you reach 24% or higher (approximately 10,000 to 20,000 more beats per day), and that clearly requires care.
They can, indeed. When PVCs occur frequently enough, your heart regularly contracts in an uncoordinated manner, which might eventually deteriorate the pumping function. The good news is that this type of heart failure is typically curable. Most people notice a recovery in their heart function when the PVCs are controlled with medication or ablation.
This has to do with the historic CAST trial. Researchers found that flecainide actually increased the risk of death in individuals with structural heart disease, despite the drug's exceptional ability to reduce PVCs. The potentially dangerous rhythms you are trying to halt could be caused by unpredictable interactions between the medicine and scar tissue.
Hope you found this blog helpful for your E-learning for NEET SS Medicine. For more informative and interesting posts like these, keep reading PrepLadder’s blogs.
Download PrepLadder's best app for neet ss preparation for Android. Download PrepLadder's best app for neet ss preparation for ios

Access all the necessary resources you need to succeed in your competitive exam preparation. Stay informed with the latest news and updates on the upcoming exam, enhance your exam preparation, and transform your dreams into a reality!
The most popular search terms used by aspirants
Avail 24-Hr Free Trial